Am 28.08.2015 4:59 vorm. schrieb "Niall Douglas" <s_sourceforge@nedprod.com
:
On 27 Aug 2015 at 15:31, VinÃcius dos Santos Oliveira wrote:
Remember that Hartmut and Thomas are coming from a standards-ease perspective, and hence their disavowal of thinking in terms of anything not termed in standards-ease.
That's quite a statement! *YOU* are the one claiming standard conformance. That's the reason why *I* argue in terms of the standard. I absolutely have no problem with other design decisions if the rationales behind them are sane, but you can't have both, standard compliance and non standard compliance, decide yourself. And yes, I have significant experience in both standard complaint and non standard compliant futures. It took me quite a while to understand all decisions but after all I'm quite happy that we adapted our implementation to be aligned with the standard and now design library APIs and applications that result out of that ecosystem.