Re: [boost] [thread] Backwards compatibility for timed_lock?

Chris Newbold <Chris.Newbold@mathworks.com> writes:

We're in the process of upgrading to 1.35 and have discovered that there are no timed_lock() overloads accepting the old xtime structure. Was this intentional or an oversight? It isn't mentioned in the list of "breaking changes" in the 1.35 release notes.

For example, timed_wait() does have overloads for xtime...

It's an oversight. I intended uses of xtime to work as before. Please file a trac ticket. Anthony -- Anthony Williams | Just Software Solutions Ltd Custom Software Development | http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk Registered in England, Company Number 5478976. Registered Office: 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL