Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
On 06/21/2012 07:16 AM, Larry Evans wrote:
On 05/22/12 15:34, Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
I'd like to request a formal review of the TypeErasure library that I've posted about several times before here. [snip] Online documentation can be found here: http://steven_watanabe.users.sourceforge.net/type_erasure/libs/type_erasure/
The page:
*/libs/type_erasure/doc/html/boost_typeerasure /concept.html#boost_typeerasure.concept.concept_map
with section title, "Concept Maps", seems to be about specializing a builtin concept. I don't see anything in that section about a map.
a) This applies to any concept, not just builtin ones. b) "Concept Map" is the concept term for specialization.
FWIW - Personally I've always found the word "concept" used in this context as extremely unexpressive and misleading. I believe that this naming has prevented this extremely useful idea from spreading as far within the C++ community as it deserves to be. Maybe we should start referring to this idea as "Type Requirements". I never figured out what "concept map" is supposed to mean. Maybe you've cleared that up for me. Maybe it should be referred to "Type Requirement Inheritance" Robert Ramey
In Christ, Steven Watanabe
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost