21 Dec
2008
21 Dec
'08
8:06 a.m.
on Sat Dec 20 2008, "Vladimir Batov" <batov-AT-people.net.au> wrote:
I searched high and low and I was not able to find any hints about equivalency of the default-constructed objects (required, expected, assumed or otherwise). And I am still under impression that that requirement (or expectation) cannot be real as many classes are not even meant to be comparable.
I believe the general consensus about that is changing, at least somewhat.
I do not think it makes them unusable with the std containers or breaking anything or second-class classes of no interest to the Standards committee.
You might Google for 'stepanov "regular types"' -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com