Re: [boost] [local_function] any interest in a LocalFunction library?

On 15/09/10 18:55, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:

As of right now, local function will be implemented more or less using the following skeleton code (many thanks to John Bytheway for refining my global base functors trick):

You're welcome :). I will say that you may wish to switch back from operator() to a named function (for the sake of clarity). I only switched to operator() because I thought it would allow use of boost::ref (which it doesn't). John