28 Nov
2008
28 Nov
'08
9:30 p.m.
on Tue Nov 25 2008, Alexander Terekhov <terekhov-AT-web.de> wrote:
David Abrahams wrote: [...]
OK, great, a second data point. How do you feel about the fact that the upcoming standard requires the catch(...)?
IMO, that's very idiotic, if true.
I think what I wrote was misleading. I should have written that it requires the catch(...) on any platform that doesn't automatically call terminate() as part of the response when an exception escapes from a thread. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com