[boost] Fwd: Changes to __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ in clang

Hi all, I recently send an email to the clang mailing list, to change how clang prints __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ [0], and one person raised a question if it would break boost. Honestly, I don't know boost's code and I could only find a few places where it's used, mainly for diagnostics, but also in CTTI and hanna; that's why I'm sending this email to ask for some help. Does boost relies on the format of these macros? The main idea is to just change how templates are printed, from: X<void>::X() [T = void] to a gcc-like style: X<T>::X() [with T = void] Thank you, [0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2018-February/056766.html -- Mikhail Ramalho.