
1 May
2009
1 May
'09
7:38 a.m.
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 7:06 AM, David Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
I just saw this post on comp.lang.c++.moderated. I wonder if the Boost.TR1 documentation shouldn't clarify its intended use or degree of conformity. I don't think TR1 conformity is something we have been paying much attention to, is it?
It was clear to me that the conformance of Boost.TR1 depends on the conformance of the respective Boost libraries. There is a "TR1 By Subject" page that seems to address this: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_38_0/doc/html/boost_tr1/subject_list.html Regards, Eugene Wee