24 May
2011
24 May
'11
10:53 a.m.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Olaf van der Spek <ml@vdspek.org> wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Marsh Ray <marsh@extendedsubset.com> wrote:
Thus, it is better to use optional<T or &> instead of pointers whenever it supplies the required operations.
When auto is available, the disadvantage of boost::optional is minimal. It's clear that some people really prefer boost::optional, so find_opt or find_optional could be provided as well.
But again: To what Boost lib could this be added? Utility?
Somebody? Olaf