19 Nov
2009
19 Nov
'09
6:50 p.m.
Scott McMurray wrote:
2009/11/19 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev@gmail.com>:
I don't think this is a good idea. I participated John Torjo's library and despite the fact I tried to be as objective as I could I ended up comparing my library with John's. As you may imagine, my opinion was biased.
I think intentionally-biased "this is why my way is better" notes from both authors would be a nice way of discussing the various trade-offs in the review.
In that case both authors will most likely give negative reviews to the opponent's library. I know, review managers are not bound with votes, but it still counts in the final review report. I don't think it would be ethical of me to influence review results of my opponent.