I ask for the first, but depending on what you'll show I could ask for the second. I mean this lib is a very good idea but that I would like to see what it is capable of in order to see if it would be fine as it is now or if it needs to be completed with 'a fuller set of operations'. Thanks. On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 3:47 AM, Brook Milligan <brook@biology.nmsu.edu>wrote:
Alp Mestan writes:
I think it can be interesting, but can you write a sample that makes a deeper use of your lib ?
By "deeper use", do you mean at the application level or at the library implementation level? In the context of the polynomial example, I'm asking whether you are seeking something more at the level of _using_ the polynomials for some application-specific purpose or at the level of _implementing_ a more complete polynomial library with a fuller set of operations?
Cheers, Brook _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
-- Alp Mestan --- http://blog.mestan.fr/ --- http://alp.developpez.com/ --- In charge of the Qt, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence sections on Developpez