Matias Capeletto wrote:
On 8/6/07, John Phillips <phillips@delos.mps.ohio-state.edu> wrote:
To date there have been no reviews of the time series library posted to the developer or user lists. Is this a bad time for a review, or is no one interested enough in this library to put in the time to submit one? If you feel the library isn't interesting or useful enough, please post a note to the list so I can see that opinion. If you are struggling for time to do the review, please post at least a short opinion, and if a few days extension will make a difference we can investigate that possibility. However, the next review begins on August 13, so time for this is somewhat limited.
I really want to participate but I gave my last exam last week and now I am heading to an Open Source congress for a week. I think I will not have time for a formal review there :(
I have already give Eric feedback a month ago, and I think the library is a nice inclusion for piece wise manipulation series like the ones found in banking account management.
I am not convinced that is the best approach for a general discrete signals framework where to build up digital systems libraries, like FIR and IIR filters, filter networks or non linear and adaptive filters.
<snip> Matias, if you summarize your DSP design ideas for the list, then I can tell everyone what I told you ... that a similar design was tried for Time_series and found not to work in practice. I asked you to try writing generic algorithms using the concepts you designed. Have you? -- Eric Niebler Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com