6 Nov
2012
6 Nov
'12
4:53 p.m.
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Olaf van der Spek <ml@vdspek.org> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Peter Dimov <lists@pdimov.com> wrote:
At the moment I'm inclined to leave shared_array as is, purely as a legacy, and focus on shared_ptr<T[]> as the spiffy new way forward.
What about a variant (of either shared_ptr<T[]> or shared_array) that knows it's size and can thus be used as a range/sequence? There's demand for it too.
Peter? -- Olaf