18 Jun
2009
18 Jun
'09
12:17 p.m.
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:11 +0200, "Philippe Vaucher" <philippe.vaucher@gmail.com> wrote:
While I totally agree with that, I just want to point out that the discussion wether this library should support more protocols than HTTP raise a fundamental design issue: if you start to make it support more protocols, then you'll end with something like libcurl (which is a very nice library), and if that's the case it might be simpler to write a boost libcurl wrapper (the current c++ wrapper of libcurl aren't very nicely designed).
That doesn't exactly meet the design goal of being an example for (and integrating with) Boost.Asio :) Cheers, Chris