At Wed, 02 Feb 2011 14:41:50 -0800, Gregory Crosswhite wrote:
I hadn't looked at the latest version of Phoenix until just now, so I didn't realize that so much had changed --- thank you very much for directing my attention towards it! It looks like it might actually fit the bill for most of my uses, so when I get a chance I will experiment with using it to replace Boost.Local in my code. There are some cases where the function body is sufficiently non-trivial that translating everything into the special syntax of Phoenix might be a pain, but I could very well be wrong. I'll let you know what I think about how how well it solves the problem I faced versus Boost.Local after I've tried it out.
That'll be very interesting information. If you can get compilation-time results as part of it, doubly so. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com