Re: [boost] Re: Proposal for cleanup of INT64 macros

Sounds good. "Assertion":

"The existence of _any_ 64-bit integer type implies the definedness of [u]int64_t and in this case the macro BOOST_NO_INT64_T is not set."

Correct ?

Correct.

Indeed. Unfortunately I have to overload for all intrinsic types ;-( , that's why I ask these strange questions.

(After reading your following post and 'is_integral.hpp', I figure working around it with 'is_integral' - although unhandy in my particular situation - may be the lesser of two evils...)

OK understood, in that case you need to go down the is_integral route. John.