
2 Jun
2005
2 Jun
'05
1:28 a.m.
Howard Hinnant wrote:
On Jun 1, 2005, at 6:31 PM, Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
So who's right -- Metrowerks or everyone else?
I believe everyone else is. This snippet compiles on a more recent internal compiler.
I looked around for a workaround, but haven't come up with one yet.
Thanks, Howard. I've found a workaround for my current application: using finite state machines as filters. Can I conclude from your statement about the internal compiler that the problem also exists in CodeWarrior 9.5, so that I should use TESTED_AT(0x3206) to guard my workaround?
-Howard
Jonathan