Re: [boost] Boost 2.0 ideas (was Re: Boost is supposed to serve *the entire C++ community; it isn't Boost's goal to serve Boost's c

Stefan Seefeld wrote:

So my counter-proposal (which I have repeatedly voiced over past years) would be to let Boost evolve into an *umbrella organization* with a relatively high degree of autonomy for *member projects* to decide for their own on things like what infrastructure tools to use (to build, test, document, to track issues and feature requests, etc.), so long as certain quality standards are maintained.

And what will this umbrella organization actually *do*?