A simplified one is interesting! I think here we did not need a simplified one but one that can serves the interface that is listed in Boost.XML. Thank you. 2010/3/29 Rob Riggs <rob@pangalactic.org>
On 03/28/2010 06:01 AM, Qingli Ma wrote:
Hi ! I have studied some XML parses both in C++ and Java. After comparing with each other, I think that the API interface are more or less the same, however the performance and the complexity of programming is different.
So I think mine is to improve the performance and make XML related programming easier.
I decide that I am going to make a backend that supports the Reader and the dom interface. I've asked advice from my teachers and he think I am capable of such a job.
Is anyone working on a simplified C++ API for XML, maybe something inspired by Groovy's XmlSlurper or Python's ElementTree API?
Rob
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost