17 Dec
2012
17 Dec
'12
11:50 p.m.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 12:29 AM, Adam Wulkiewicz <adam.wulkiewicz@gmail.com> wrote:
Dave Abrahams wrote:
Hmm, it will be interesting to see how this works. Now that the weasel-wording is gone, the allocator's pointer type, etc., have specific meanings that might not be compatible with stack memory.
Could you please elaborate? Isn't it always a pointer to a type passed to the allocator? How it may be treated differently for stack memory?
In theory it might be a street address that stores a certain value. In practise it's probably not but I don't think it's guaranteed to be T*. -- Olaf