On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Joachim Faulhaber <afojgo@googlemail.com> wrote:
2011/3/5 Doug Gregor <doug.gregor@gmail.com>:
I've been going through the Boost.Icl test failures for Clang, and there are few conformance issues that should be addressed on the Boost side.
The main issue is the test fastest_set_icl_set.cpp, which has some declaration-ordering issues with templates that only Clang seems to diagnose (I've verified that Clang is right).
[...]
Big thanks to Joachim for such an excellent compiler test case :)
Hi Doug again,
Big thanks for your excellent error report. Based on it I got my includes detangled easily. I fixed the conformance issues and removed markups. ICL tests with clang (except for libcxx[0x]-configs) are all fine now.
Great!
Ahh ... it feels good to be in harmony with clang and the standard :-D
... BTW the German word for harmony is Einklang, which -- many don't know this anymore -- has its ancient roots in: To be "one with clang" :-}
:) - Doug