
23 Aug
2007
23 Aug
'07
8:25 a.m.
Andrey Semashev <andysem <at> mail.ru> writes:
This would be a very nice addition for the typeof-based macros. But, I still would like to have an alternative syntax not involving Boost.Typeof, as it's quoted below.
If other people vote for it, I'll add it.
I think, a short table with test results on most common compilers (say, GCC and VC 7.1) would be a good performance indication to users.
OK. -- Alexander