8 Mar
2010
8 Mar
'10
9:30 p.m.
Am Monday 08 March 2010 21:06:44 schrieb Josh Faust:
need the "lock"->"lock;" or "+r"->"+q" changes.
thanks for trying this, I have not yet found time to install gcc-4.0.1 for reproducing this
Let me know if you want me to test anything for you.
Have tried it over the weekend, and mainline gcc-4.0.1 on Linux miscompiles in exactly the same way you described, so I can now reproduce it (and yes, it is definitely a compiler bug). I am still trying to figure out what exactly is going wrong in gcc. Best regards Helge