21 Apr
2004
21 Apr
'04
3:03 p.m.
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> writes:
I don't have 9 since my beta license expired and a new one hasn't arrived from MW yet. I could just turn those overloads off for all __MWERKS__ if a conforming compiler shouldn't need them. Is that what you had in mind?
No, no. The overloads are required to support
bind<int&>( &X::i, _1 )(x) = 5;
but this is not a critical feature (which is why there are no tests for it),
Aside from my objection, maybe you should accept my other patch in that case, since it ought to function equivalently to the overloads accepted by a conforming compiler. I wouldn't want to vouch for it without some tests, though. Could you please write me some? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com