David Bergman wrote:
On Dec 6, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
David Bergman wrote:
Yes, of course, which I have stated in various posts of mine.
I *know* that the implementations differ, but that was not what we were discussing here, was it? We are discussing whether the feature sets and interfaces are far apart or not.
Could we move on?
Oh, sorry. But when someone claims that I do not realize that the implementations differ, I have a hard time letting that lie. I do not enjoy people putting opinions in my virtual mouth.
/David _______________________________________________
I apologize David if it came across that way. I was simply trying to determine if you thought the implementation variations that distinguish a library's relevance to a target were important to the review. I've read all of your posts. I know that you can articulate the differences in implementation. I was just wondering if you thought that was an important distinguisher for Boost. As for moving on, I'm happy to do so (o; michael -- ---------------------------------- Michael Caisse Object Modeling Designs www.objectmodelingdesigns.com