7 May
2024
7 May
'24
5:15 p.m.
On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 6:33 AM Niall Douglas via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I don't think the problem is getting a library into a fit state for standardisation,
but rather how library standardisation works at WG21 is not fit for purpose
in
my opinion. In other words, the problem isn't a technical one, it's a
_process_ and _political_ problem, in my opinion.
I agree with Niall here. The structure of WG21 creates perverse incentives, producing outcomes which are not aligned with the needs of the wider C++ community. For example "the standard library can't connect to the internet." Thanks