Re: [boost] Switch to CMake -- Analysis

On 21.07.2017 12:19, Vinnie Falco via Boost wrote:

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Stefan Seefeld via Boost wrote:

...

You are talking about a use-case involving a Boost *binary* package. How is this related to how Boost is built, i.e. how such binaries are produced ? It is not related to building Boost but it solves something that annoys a non-zero percentage of Boost users who use CMake.

Then *please* let's not add unrelated points to the discussion, for the sake of getting a handle of what problems we have to solve, and how. Stefan -- ...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...