24 Apr
2010
24 Apr
'10
4:24 a.m.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:58 PM, David Deakins <ddeakins@veeco.com> wrote:
So that appears to be the phenomenon. Unfortunately, I don't have a good suggestion for anything you can do to work around this problem.
David, thanks for the excellent report. See attached patch. With it, boost::exception objects should be able to survive double-deletion due to compiler bugs. Could you give it a try, and if it works I'll commit it. Thanks, Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode