17 Apr
2011
17 Apr
'11
10:08 p.m.
Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
What about the part of what I said that you stripped off ("...or perform some other task")?
I can think of a legitimate scenario in which you'd want such errors to be logged - automated (non-interactive) testing. Other tasks don't spring to mind. I don't consider such support essential though, or absolutely required for such a library.
And which error handlers were we talking about here?
The hypothetical error handlers that the library would invoke were it extended to do so.