
25 Oct
2012
25 Oct
'12
9:25 p.m.
On 25/10/12 16:56, Matthew Chambers wrote:
I'm forwarding this from the boost-build list to get a broader perspective from boost users and probably also some Boost.Build users that don't monitor that list.
How many agree with Steven that for <variant>debug: "The libraries that are built need to be ABI compatible with code that isn't compiled using Boost.Build."
How many would sacrifice ABI compatibility in order for <runtime-debugging>on to actually do something for GCC?
Don't sacrifice ABI compatibility. Make a superdebug variant or something.