3 Jun
2005
3 Jun
'05
6:51 p.m.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Here's my version:
[snip] That code looks great! Any reason it can't go into boost as is? I would like to see that and a version which takes the step as a template parameter, to improve efficiency when the step size is known at compile-time. -Christopher Diggins