AlisdairM wrote:
i.e: I assume the following are the same type (and not just equivalent)
typedef typename add_ref< add_const< T > >::type ref_const_t; typedef typename add_const< add_ref< T > >::type const_ref_t;
Ok, I REALLY need to get a better proof-reader: I assume the following are the same type (and not just equivalent) typedef typename add_ref< add_const< T >::type >::type ref_const_t; typedef typename add_const< add_ref< T >::type >::type const_ref_t; Instead I get 2 distinct types with all Borland compiler I have access to: T const & T & const The latter does not look like a valid C++ type to me, and I have recently filed a bug report with Borland about this. I am sure they would like to hear I am wrong, and their compiler is correct ;?) --- AlisdairM