Re: [boost] namespace naming -- the question to moderators

This kind of unnamed namespace can be handled correctly by both MS compilers, with respect to pch, but I don't believe it satisfies the Boost naming convention. OTOH, if no other solution is found, this is the only way we can achieve typeof compliance with pch, while still staying in the unnamed namespace.

I'm surprised the any kind of unnamed namespace can be handled by PCH's: after all each TU should get it's own distict name for the unnamed namespace. John.