5 May
2011
5 May
'11
2:21 p.m.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:
Nevin Liber wrote:
I have a hard time imaging a useable code base which has a convention that any time a pointer is returned one should assume that the memory must be deleted by the caller.
That used to be the norm before smart pointers caught on. I cannot say how common it is today, but the possibility exists.
Really? Got any reference for that?