Re: [boost] question about C++11 guidelines

On 2 May 2012 23:01, Eric Niebler <eric@boostpro.com> wrote:

I'm leaning toward using std:: where I can, and falling back on Boost's versions only when there is a compelling reason.

I'll only comment on my libraries. For unordered containers, my advice is to use the standard versions if they're up to scratch. They have some implementation advantages over the boost version, and it's a good idea for everyone to settle on the same version. With boost::hash or std::hash, it's a little less clear cut, since boost::hash does a bit more than the standard version. If anyone wishes to use boost::hash with the standard unordered containers, C++11 template aliases will make that a lot easier.