23 Oct
2009
23 Oct
'09
2:40 p.m.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart@sig.com> wrote:
Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Stewart, Robert
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Frank Mori Hess <frank.hess@nist.gov> wrote:
Would a boost/ptr_container.hpp that includes all containers make sense?
One suggestion I liked that came up earlier was using all.hpp, for example boost/ptr_container/all.hpp.
Doesn't boost/ptr_container.hpp mean the same?
Yes, but the idea of all.hpp was to avoid adding to boost/.
As the file has the same name as the directory, I don't see the advantage of that.