Gennaro Prota wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 17:11:19 -0700, Jeff Garland
and also wanted to make it interoperable with Boost.Date_Time without actually coupling with it. Well, this can certainly be done but is it really worth it?
I don't know. I'm not very knowledgeable about the date_time library, which is one of the reasons why I postponed the issue.
Ok, well there's been 'a strategy' that we should do some minor interface upgrades and add some higher resolution timers to the timer library. The strategy was to incorporate into date-time using date-time types. It's been on my todo list, for well, too long. Then others started working on this in seemingly divergent directions...
[...]
As for the trivial interface bringing discussion, due to reasons absolutely beyond me I've been away from this list for two years. You may have noticed that I'm reproposing things which were preliminarily submitted in 2004, for instance. Hoping next time I'll amuse you with a quip rather than supposedly technical discussion.
Sounds good ;-) Jeff