20 Jan
2009
20 Jan
'09
3:01 p.m.
on Tue Jan 20 2009, "Thomas Klimpel" <Thomas.Klimpel-AT-synopsys.com> wrote:
Anis Benyelloul wrote:
PS. But the page talks about using CMake (i.e replacing bjam???) Aren't we mixing two problems? (the build system used vs. the way libraries are organized)
I guess CMake is not as powerful as bjam, and therefore requires the libraries to be more modularized.
Not really. It's just much, much better that way... as it is for bjam. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://boostpro.com