28 May
2011
28 May
'11
8:48 p.m.
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Matt Calabrese <rivorus@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't think that would be too much of a problem in this particular case given the simplicity of the macro and the fact that it doesn't really generate code that you'd have to step through (just the code for the return type and function declaration)
Woops, correcting myself here, it would generate a small amount of code. -- -Matt Calabrese