On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
Kornel Kisielewicz wrote:
Mind you, I'm not trying to convince anyone to the creation of a new Boost.Patterns library (although I'd really like to do that if possible), instead I'd like to ask you if there's a viable GSoC proposal in this post, one that one day might turn into a useful part of boost.
I suppose there could be, but I'm not really convinced by the patterns you're proposing.
Suggestions for others really welcome!
I'd be more interested in tools and utilities that factor the common idioms as mixins or macros than in the GoF patterns.
I was thinking on those lines too, I wonder however how many useful mixins could one come up with. Most of the most useful ones can't be implemented in C++ cleanly, or are already covered by C++11. Any ideas? -- regards, Kornel Kisielewicz