Philippe Vaucher wrote:
1) The original author does not seem to be available. 2) Significant portions of the documentation remain incomplete. 3) Asynchronous streams and other issues brought up during review appear to be incomplete.
Yeah I raised this issue about 1-2 months ago and no one bothered answering my email, I guess everyone simply don't know what's going on or at least don't know more that what you already mentioned.
Sorry, sometimes it's hard to keep up with this list let alone answer.
I think someone will have to stand up and say something like "ok I'll take care of this library from now". At the moment I really can't do it but *maybe* after I'm done with another library I might take a look at what needs to be done.
Yes, we need one or more volunteers to look after the library.
Is anyone still working on this library?
No, although we did get a recent 1.34 patch from a volunteer.
I'm guessing only bugfixes.
Is it being proposed for standardization?
Doubt it, but I don't know.
No, not at this point.
Are there any other planned Boost libraries that do a similar thing to
this one?
What exactly do you mean by similar ? Anyway I think the answer is no :)
There are no libraries like it that I'm aware of. Jeff