Thanks. Upon reviewing my initial post I think I could have communicated more clearly. Will everyone please vote on one of the following two options:
1. Boost adopts the proposed new logo with Alliance as custodian of the trademark
Logo's like websites are touch to make choices on because so much is down to aesthetics, but I rather liked the new design when I first saw it, and seen in the broader context of the proposed new website I believe it makes sense to adopt it (though largely I'm deferring to Rene here for it's technical merits). If as suggested we can find a "Mozilla like" compromise on usage to maintain a good balance between open-source ethos and brand protection that would be better still (this actually applies to the old logo as well, which I don't *think* was ever BSL - it's not actually clear what it is to be honest from a legal point of view). Robert: I do take your point that fiddling with branding is often a sign of business failure, not least when products randomly begin changing names, I don't believe that's what we have here, more of an evolution and/or reboot within the broader context of a new website. Best, John.