Moreover, I'm not sure how to disable the slowing down options such as deffered events etc.?
I would be surprised if deferred events costed much compile time.
Yea, I agree that compilation time should not be affected. However a runtime performance could have, right? I was asking becuase it can be clearly seen that eUML2 is ~5 times slower
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:54 PM, Christophe Henry-2 [via Boost] < ml-node+s2283326n4683177h6@n4.nabble.com> wrote: than eUML (17ms vs 100ms) and therefore I assumed that not the same back-end is used, in a sens, that is less optimized, because it has some features enabled by default. _______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
------------------------------ If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/MSM-Is-there-any-interest-in-C-14-Boost-M... To unsubscribe from [MSM] Is there any interest in C++14 Boost.MSM-eUML like library which compiles up to 60x quicker whilst being a slightly faster too?, click here http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=4683016&code=a3J6eXN6dG9mQGp1c2lhay5uZXR8NDY4MzAxNnwtMTY0MTkzNTIwMA== . NAML http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/MSM-Is-there-any-interest-in-C-14-Boost-M... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.