On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Stefan Strasser <strasser@uni-bremen.de>wrote:
I'm still interested in seeing what you've developed and in your ideas, as we've discussed off-list. but considering the lack of replies and that a boost library submission requires a review manager, several reviewers, and more people interested, I came to the conclusion that it will probably not end up a boost library even if we'll finish it. if anyone disagrees please share your first impression of the documentation available at https://svn.boost.org/svn/** boost/sandbox/persistent/libs/**persistent/doc/html/index.html<https://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/persistent/libs/persistent/doc/html/index.html>
I am also very much interested in a persentence library, and although I am a boost user rather than developer, I will try to follow along the best I can if development continues towards this library. I have seen from a response in 2010 that undo/redo is considered to be outside the scope of this libary, but it can be facilitated with transactions and changesets. I think an example of this in the documentation, along with a simple undo/redo scheme, would help to clarify (for me, anyway) how this library could be used to accomplish such a necessary and often complex task. Best, Rich