[boost] Re: Re: [spirit] rule<> and copying

Hartmut wrote: | Thorsten Ottosen wrote: | | What am I overlooking? Why | > do we need the current copy/assignment semantics? | | That's to allow to write: | | rule<> a = /* some spirit parser here */; | rule<> b = a; | | Which is needed (or at least handy) in some parser contexts. ok, I guess I just have to start using a typedef: typdef rule<>& rule_type; rule_type foo(); br Thorsten