Re: [boost] Re: Lock unification [move]

Howard Hinnant wrote:

Thanks everyone for your comments and patience. There's a new spec up at:

http://home.twcny.rr.com/hinnant/cpp_extensions/threads.html

I've tried to incorporate those comments I've agreed with, and explain my disagreements below. Further discussion would be much appreciated.

Something that I missed the first time: I'd prefer more fine-grained exceptions. lock_error should be a base class only.