Rene Rivera wrote:
Simon Buchan wrote:
Cory Nelson wrote:
Umm.. what are you refering to?
On 9/28/05, Simon Buchan <simon@hand-multimedia.co.nz> wrote:
So, is any code written for this? Raw code is easier to critique, even if it's just proof-of-concept stuff. Of course, I'd be happy to do some work for this, if we ever agree what to do :D
The topic above? With all those responses about small details of a (presumably) unwritten library?
A: Because it's hard to read Q: Why shouldn't I reply above a message?
Because you removed all traces on the subject and in the content to give others any idea of what you are talking about. This is an email forum and many people don't see the thread context, and hence can't tell that you replied to a particular message. Next time it would be wise to include some context if you want to increase the likelihood of sensible responses.
Right. I didn't realise that this was how threadless views did this. Sorry, won't happen again. Since I replied to the initial colour lib (since it wasn't related to the rest of the discussion), and it was empty by a OP mistake, I didn't have anything to quote. So, more on topic: is an actual implementation of the proposed color lib in development? ie. is there any code that I can compile and take a look at the decisions being made in context?