Re: [boost] Boost 1.65.0 Release Candidate 1

7 Aug 2017

      On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Raffi Enficiaud via Boost <
boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
...
Le 07.08.17 à 00:04, Tom Westerhout via Boost a écrit :
...
On 06/08/2017, Marshall Clow via Boost  wrote:
...
The release candidates for the 1.65.0 release are now available at:
https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/release/1.65.0/source/
The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
0f1352a7738f24b39b564263b66a8c38bc7d984b57406396400474602e961ad3
boost_1_65_0_rc1.7z
c2a022d4d6706668ea94b8e799a76e38929e0e34db884ef451fa9d5db6103238
boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.bz2
7e84a27276792209d48357a0671348768dbf4dd1d4eadbf01b855274208f148d
boost_1_65_0_rc1.tar.gz
537c42771b2351b4ea3eb8e9a13a3423edcd155323d2c14c4606cd23fc22d09f
boost_1_65_0_rc1.zip
As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
Sure. I've tried building on Linux 3.16 with GCC-7.1.0 and Clang-trunk:
* Clang-trunk (-std=c++1z -stdlib=libc++)
1) Boost.Test failed. There's no bind1st in std:: anymore. Neither is
  there a random_shuffle.
The calls to random_shuffle are protected by
#ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE
and the ones of bind1st by
#ifdef BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS
Those preprocessor checks looked ok to me, what am I missing?
As a test, I added the following lines to
libs/config/include/boost/config/stdlib/libcpp.hpp:

#if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) &&
!defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE)
#  define BOOST_NO_CXX98_RANDOM_SHUFFLE
#endif
#if (_LIBCPP_VERSION > 4000) && (__cplusplus > 201402L) &&
!defined(_LIBCPP_ENABLE_CXX17_REMOVED_RANDOM_SHUFFLE)
#  define BOOST_NO_CXX98_BINDERS
#endif

and Boost.Test build successfully.

Locale, Wave, and fiber still failed.

I will prepare a PR for Boost.config.

-- Marshall