---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <boost-request@lists.boost.org> Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 3:00 PM Subject: Boost Digest, Vol 6656, Issue 1 To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Send Boost mailing list submissions to boost@lists.boost.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to boost-request@lists.boost.org You can reach the person managing the list at boost-owner@lists.boost.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Boost digest..." The boost archives may be found at: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/ Today's Topics: 1. Re: [Graph] Attempt to resolve open issue (Anne van de Graaf) 2. Master branch now closed for 1.79.0 beta release (Marshall Clow) 3. [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available (Marshall Clow) 4. Re: [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available (Marshall Clow) 5. Re: [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available (Andrey Semashev) 6. Re: [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available (Marshall Clow) 7. Re: [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available (Andrey Semashev) 8. Re: [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available (Tom Kent) 9. Re: [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available (Matt Borland) 10. Re: [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available (Andrey Semashev) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Anne van de Graaf <A.vandeGraaf@dianafea.com> To: Jeremy Murphy <jeremy.william.murphy@gmail.com> Cc: "boost@lists.boost.org" <boost@lists.boost.org>, John Maddock < jz.maddock@googlemail.com> Bcc: Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 13:17:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [boost] [Graph] Attempt to resolve open issue
This is fixed on the develop branch, btw, have you verified that it works as expected now?
Apologies for my late reply. Yes, I have verified that the fix on the develop branch works as expected. Thank you very much for the work that you have done. Best regards, Anne On Fri, 10 Dec 2021 at 18:56, Anne van de Graaf <A.vandeGraaf@dianafea.com <mailto:A.vandeGraaf@dianafea.com>> wrote:
Hi Anne,
which issue or pull request # is it? Hi Jeremy,
It is issue # 268: https://github.com/boostorg/graph/issues/268 Best regards, Anne
Jeremy
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 at 02:20, Anne van de Graaf via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org<mailto:boost@lists.boost.org>> wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to get an open issue in Boost.Graph resolved. Since I haven't received any response at the corresponding GitHub page nor from the Boost Users mailing list (where I posted the below message last Monday), I am reaching out to you. My aim is to get in touch with the maintainer(s) of Boost.Graph in order to discuss what is the preferred/most efficient way to fix the issue. Since this is my first post to this mailing list, please accept my apologies if you feel this is not the right way to get in touch with the maintainers. In that case, I would appreciate it very much if you could kindly explain what I should have done instead. Please find below a copy of my message that I sent last Monday to the Boost Users mailing list. Thank you very much for your attention and any replies.
Unfortunately, Graph has no current maintainer. I have done some maintenance on that library in the past, and I know Jeremy Murphy will be trying to do some this next week, so hopefully one of us can get that one fixed!
Thanks a lot for your reply, John. I didn't know that Boost.Graph doesn't have a current maintainer. It would be great if you or Jeremy could do some maintenance on it. Feel free to contact me if I can help you in any way to get things done. We could then discuss in what way I can contribute. Thanks. Kind regards, Anne
Best, John.
-- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com> To: Boost Developers List <boost@lists.boost.org> Cc: Bcc: Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 06:31:06 -0800 Subject: [boost] Master branch now closed for 1.79.0 beta release Please do not make any commits to the master branch. — Marshall ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com> To: Boost Developers List <boost@lists.boost.org> Cc: Bcc: Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 07:27:19 -0800 Subject: [boost] [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available are now available at: <https://boostorg.jfrog.io/ui/native/main/beta/1.79.0.beta1/source < https://boostorg.jfrog.io/ui/native/main/beta/1.79.0.beta1/source>> The SHA256 checksums are as follows: 8985105623f48d55be01076d98ca4e7a8cb548a8d7f9ad0e1fc3c710d2c75fcf boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.tar.bz2 4b58e4d3b6ff1176b3c6cb9eec496c1f6d2535270e97ec140da533d68766ca39 boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.tar.gz 768875ad5c77763445e8b119072cfa1e64854b071a353dd44c3c73ff46df910b boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.zip 4d05b458cd039afe86003cf7e1e6c3a358b5b2d031892e620eedc344ab200246 boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.7z As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy. -- The Release Managers It fails on Window 11 using GCC-11.2 command line ; b2 cxxstd=20 toolset=gcc --build-type=complete stage here is the error message ; FailBoost1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 (github.com) <https://gist.github.com/salimp2009/854b3c74295b2487c4585be35f8bfbd0> Salim (a new bee in devel :) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com> To: Boost Developers List <boost@lists.boost.org> Cc: Bcc: Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 08:03:12 -0800 Subject: Re: [boost] [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available On Mar 10, 2022, at 7:27 AM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
are now available at: <https://boostorg.jfrog.io/ui/native/main/beta/1.79.0.beta1/source <
https://boostorg.jfrog.io/ui/native/main/beta/1.79.0.beta1/source>>
The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
8985105623f48d55be01076d98ca4e7a8cb548a8d7f9ad0e1fc3c710d2c75fcf
boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.tar.bz2
4b58e4d3b6ff1176b3c6cb9eec496c1f6d2535270e97ec140da533d68766ca39 boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.tar.gz 768875ad5c77763445e8b119072cfa1e64854b071a353dd44c3c73ff46df910b boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.zip 4d05b458cd039afe86003cf7e1e6c3a358b5b2d031892e620eedc344ab200246 boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.7z
As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
I have successfully built the libraries: * On Mac OS 10.15, using Apple clang version 11.0.3, and and c++03/11/14/17/2a — Marshall ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev@gmail.com> To: boost@lists.boost.org Cc: Bcc: Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 20:17:42 +0300 Subject: Re: [boost] [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available On 3/10/22 18:27, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
are now available at: <https://boostorg.jfrog.io/ui/native/main/beta/1.79.0.beta1/source < https://boostorg.jfrog.io/ui/native/main/beta/1.79.0.beta1/source>>
The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
8985105623f48d55be01076d98ca4e7a8cb548a8d7f9ad0e1fc3c710d2c75fcf boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.tar.bz2 4b58e4d3b6ff1176b3c6cb9eec496c1f6d2535270e97ec140da533d68766ca39 boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.tar.gz 768875ad5c77763445e8b119072cfa1e64854b071a353dd44c3c73ff46df910b boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.zip 4d05b458cd039afe86003cf7e1e6c3a358b5b2d031892e620eedc344ab200246 boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.7z
As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
I'm trying to download the source package now, and the download speed is terrible, ~30-60 KB/s. Is this expected? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com> To: boost@lists.boost.org Cc: Bcc: Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 09:53:08 -0800 Subject: Re: [boost] [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available On Mar 10, 2022, at 9:17 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 3/10/22 18:27, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
are now available at: <https://boostorg.jfrog.io/ui/native/main/beta/1.79.0.beta1/source <
https://boostorg.jfrog.io/ui/native/main/beta/1.79.0.beta1/source>>
The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
8985105623f48d55be01076d98ca4e7a8cb548a8d7f9ad0e1fc3c710d2c75fcf
boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.tar.bz2
4b58e4d3b6ff1176b3c6cb9eec496c1f6d2535270e97ec140da533d68766ca39 boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.tar.gz 768875ad5c77763445e8b119072cfa1e64854b071a353dd44c3c73ff46df910b boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.zip 4d05b458cd039afe86003cf7e1e6c3a358b5b2d031892e620eedc344ab200246 boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.7z
As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
I'm trying to download the source package now, and the download speed is terrible, ~30-60 KB/s. Is this expected?
That’s not what I’m seeing. I’m getting > 1 MB/sec — Marshall ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev@gmail.com> To: boost@lists.boost.org Cc: Bcc: Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 21:25:53 +0300 Subject: Re: [boost] [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available On 3/10/22 20:53, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
On Mar 10, 2022, at 9:17 AM, Andrey Semashev via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
On 3/10/22 18:27, Marshall Clow via Boost wrote:
are now available at: <https://boostorg.jfrog.io/ui/native/main/beta/1.79.0.beta1/source <
https://boostorg.jfrog.io/ui/native/main/beta/1.79.0.beta1/source>>
The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
8985105623f48d55be01076d98ca4e7a8cb548a8d7f9ad0e1fc3c710d2c75fcf
boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.tar.bz2
4b58e4d3b6ff1176b3c6cb9eec496c1f6d2535270e97ec140da533d68766ca39 boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.tar.gz 768875ad5c77763445e8b119072cfa1e64854b071a353dd44c3c73ff46df910b boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.zip 4d05b458cd039afe86003cf7e1e6c3a358b5b2d031892e620eedc344ab200246 boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.7z
As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
I'm trying to download the source package now, and the download speed is terrible, ~30-60 KB/s. Is this expected?
That’s not what I’m seeing. I’m getting > 1 MB/sec
Possibly, some regional restrictions on JFrog side? I'm not seeing bandwidth issues on other sites, including GitHub, which I assume is US based. BTW, building with gcc 11.2 in C++17 mode on Kubuntu 21.10 succeeds. There are quite a few warnings about auto_ptr being deprecated, and also some suspicious warnings about freeing non-heap-allocated objects in Boost.Wave: https://github.com/boostorg/wave/issues/159 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tom Kent <lists@teeks99.com> To: Boost Developers List <boost@lists.boost.org> Cc: Bcc: Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:33:30 -0600 Subject: Re: [boost] [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 9:27 AM Marshall Clow via Boost < boost@lists.boost.org> wrote:
are now available at: <https://boostorg.jfrog.io/ui/native/main/beta/1.79.0.beta1/source < https://boostorg.jfrog.io/ui/native/main/beta/1.79.0.beta1/source>>
The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
8985105623f48d55be01076d98ca4e7a8cb548a8d7f9ad0e1fc3c710d2c75fcf boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.tar.bz2 4b58e4d3b6ff1176b3c6cb9eec496c1f6d2535270e97ec140da533d68766ca39 boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.tar.gz 768875ad5c77763445e8b119072cfa1e64854b071a353dd44c3c73ff46df910b boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.zip 4d05b458cd039afe86003cf7e1e6c3a358b5b2d031892e620eedc344ab200246 boost_1_79_0_b1_rc1.7z
As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
-- The Release Managers
Looks good on Windows/Visual Studio. toolset arch compile Link Execute msvc-10.0 32 X X X msvc-10.0 64 X X X msvc-11.0 32 X X X msvc-11.0 64 X X X msvc-12.0 32 X X X msvc-12.0 64 X X X msvc-14.0 32 X X X msvc-14.0 64 X X X msvc-14.1 32 X X X msvc-14.1 64 X X X msvc-14.2 32 X X X msvc-14.2 64 X X X msvc-14.3 32 X X X msvc-14.3 64 X X X Compile means that the b2 command completed without errors Link means that visual studio was able to link a sample executable to a library (libboost_thread-vcXXX-mt[-gd]-1_XX.lib) generated Execute means that the linked program executed without errors. Full build logs can be found here: https://gist.github.com/teeks99/acf919a716deeb001acaa2b4f12cb757 Tom ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Matt Borland <matt@mattborland.com> To: boost@lists.boost.org Cc: Bcc: Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 10:57:15 +0000 Subject: Re: [boost] [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available
As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
-- The Release Managers
_______________________________________________
Boost.Filesystem fails to build using Apple Clang 13 with C++11/14/17/20 on M1 Pro Architecture. An issue has been opened here ( https://github.com/boostorg/filesystem/issues/231). Matt ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev@gmail.com> To: boost@lists.boost.org Cc: Bcc: Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:09:22 +0300 Subject: Re: [boost] [release] Boost 1.79.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1 is available On 3/11/22 13:57, Matt Borland via Boost wrote:
As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download the
candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report both
success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
-- The Release Managers
_______________________________________________
Boost.Filesystem fails to build using Apple Clang 13 with C++11/14/17/20 on M1 Pro Architecture. An issue has been opened here ( https://github.com/boostorg/filesystem/issues/231).
As replied in the issue, your build is picking up headers from a different Boost version in /usr/local/include. _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost -- Salim Pamukcu