31 May
2005
31 May
'05
9 p.m.
Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
christopher diggins wrote:
Not if the semantics were changed so that size() returned 0 when the array was unitialized (which I think would be an improvement).
boost::array is just supposed to give built-in arrays a container interface. Built-in arrays never have size 0, so I don't see why boost::arrays should.
Also, I think someone was telling me the other day how important it is that size is known at compile-time ;-)
Jonathan